In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
275d
The statement addresses concerns about government overreach and potential violations of free speech, which are significant public issues. It suggests that the Department of Homeland Security may have acted beyond its legal mandate by targeting dissent related to COVID-19, raising questions about privacy and government accountability.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by government actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which can be constructive if it leads to accountability, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By bringing attention to potential government overreach, the statement uses influence to promote societal betterment, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing government actions that may infringe upon it, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.