Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 62
12/19/2024, 8:54:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Charles Wang
@charleswangb
·
275d
@GaryMarcus Your understanding of actual progress in AI and what’s needed - the massive gaps - going forward is better than 99.99% so called AI experts.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
275d
Total strawman.

I never said “AI is useless” (e.g., I love web search, GPS route planning, web search, recommendation engines and computational photography — and use all of those daily.)

I never even said LLMs are useless; I often say they are useful for brainstorming and…
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
275d
ChatGPT releasing Task today is my bet — this is the true beginning of ending Gary Marcus take that AI is useless. 🔥

The statement is part of a discussion on AI progress and expertise, engaging in public discourse about technology and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but asserts reliability in predictions, which is neutral in terms of harm.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement could be seen as dismissive of others' expertise, potentially lacking constructive engagement. [-1]