Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes the removal of funding for a pediatric cancer research program, attributing the decision to a wealthy individual. It uses emotive language to highlight the impact on children with cancer, aiming to provoke public concern and debate.
- The statement aims to highlight a perceived harm caused by the removal of funding, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for vulnerable groups. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does single out an individual, which could be seen as lacking respect for privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By drawing attention to the issue, the statement attempts to promote understanding and empathy for children affected by cancer. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could be seen as engaging in personal attacks by attributing blame to a specific individual without providing a nuanced discussion of the broader legislative process. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.