Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement discusses the impact of funding cuts on pediatric cancer research and drug development, highlighting the potential benefits of the original funding. It criticizes specific political figures for these cuts, suggesting a partisan perspective.
- The statement aims to highlight the negative impact of funding cuts on pediatric cancer research, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, it attributes blame to specific individuals, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech but could be seen as disrespectful by attributing blame to specific individuals without detailed evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead focuses on blaming individuals, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.