Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and the referenced conversation engage in public discourse by addressing issues related to media accountability, freedom of speech, and the actions of influential public figures in the tech industry.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of others, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but indirectly accuses others of wrongdoing, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and instead focuses on personal grievances, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes or offer a path to resolution. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds free speech by calling out perceived injustices but could use more responsible language to foster dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.