In reply to:
Jason Fyk
@JasonFyk
·
274d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
274d
The statement is part of a broader conversation about censorship and government actions, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is supportive of actions against what is perceived as a 'censorship industrial complex.'
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a legal action against perceived censorship.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on opposition to censorship.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but supports a legal challenge, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.