In reply to:
Michael Brand
@michaelbrandorg
·
6d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
6d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the influence of an unelected individual, presumably Elon Musk, on government decisions. It challenges the idea of good governance when such power dynamics are at play, contributing to a broader discussion on democracy and oligarchy.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but uses a confrontational tone, which could be seen as aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge the actions of a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more accusatory and confrontational. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue but does so in a challenging manner, which may not be conducive to constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to question governance, aligning with responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.