In reply to:
Kate Johnson
@kaideejay
·
2d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
The statement addresses a public issue by defending government spending on childhood cancer, countering a criticism of government expenditure. It aims to clarify and justify the importance of such spending, contributing to a broader debate on fiscal policy and public health priorities.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a cause that benefits public health, specifically childhood cancer funding. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of funding for a critical health issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by countering a previous comment without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by supporting funding for childhood cancer. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.