Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 110
12/20/2024, 2:49:39 PM
X
In reply to:
タクミ (e/acc)
@LiedTakumy
·
218d
@GaryMarcus I get the point about scaling LLMs alone not being enough to reach AGI, but I feel like when people suggest that a scaled-up LLM could eventually lead to AGI, they’re also implicitly factoring in the addition of things like agentic capabilities and reasoning models. So, are you…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
218d
@LiedTakumy what is that you think i said about AGI that you think is wrong? (most of what people seem to think i believe about AGI is just a strawman.)
タクミ (e/acc)
@LiedTakumy
·
218d
@GaryMarcus I mean you are right about llms just not agi
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
218d
Today will either be a mic-drop AGI moment for OpenAI, or one more in a long line of broken promises and stupid memes about me (like all the ones that wrongly mocked me for saying pure LLM scaling would not last forever).

🤷‍♂️
The Retro Burn
@burntheretro
·
218d
@iruletheworldmo @GaryMarcus

The statement is part of a public discourse on the development of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and the role of LLMs (Large Language Models) in achieving it. The conversation involves a debate on whether scaling LLMs alone can lead to AGI or if additional components like neurosymbolic systems are necessary.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a technical debate, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue, addressing a technical disagreement without personal attacks. [+1]