The statement engages in a debate about the limitations of deep learning, specifically addressing predictions about its scalability. The tone is somewhat confrontational, urging the other party to read a specific paper to understand the argument better.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but is somewhat dismissive.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on proving a point rather than fostering dialogue.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism by referencing a paper but does so in a confrontational manner.