In reply to:
Jared Oliva
@jaredpoliva
·
2d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
The statement critiques the idea of running a country with a focus solely on profit without social responsibility, contrasting it with business practices. It engages in a public discourse about governance and the role of business principles in politics.
- The statement does not directly harm others but critiques a concept, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of social conscience in governance, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a viewpoint without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to argue for a socially responsible approach to governance, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing a public issue, aligning with the principle of using a platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.