In reply to:
Chris G
@GuichardChris
·
1d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
1d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of transparency in government and the role of influential figures like Elon Musk in shaping public perception. It challenges the notion of transparency as presented by Musk and encourages individuals to verify information themselves.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on encouraging critical thinking and fact-checking. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by urging individuals to read the bill themselves, fostering informed decision-making. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the definition of transparency without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning public narratives and encouraging independent verification of information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.