Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement appears to be a headline for an opinion piece that addresses a public issue concerning the rights of special education students in Michigan. It suggests that there is a conflict or controversy regarding policies or actions that may negatively impact these students, which constitutes public discourse.
- The headline uses strong language ('cheat') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of the word 'cheat' could be seen as disrespectful to those involved in the policy debate. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The headline does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory language without providing context or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or understanding of opposing perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could be seen as using influence to highlight an important issue, but the accusatory tone may not contribute positively to societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by addressing a public issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the provocative language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.