Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
12/20/2024, 6:37:52 PM
X
In reply to:
Callum
@CallumMacClark
·
208d
@GaryMarcus cope harder
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
208d
From what I can tell from the o3 announcement, all three of these predictions will prove to be correct. The ARC results were particularly impressive.

But note that there were no demos around everyday reasoning and that the strongest results were around math problems and coding,…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
208d
Three o3 predictions:
– People will initially be amazed
- Once they dive in, they will see that it is not reliable
- It will work best in closed-domains (like math problems) but less reliably in open-ended domains (like everyday reasoning about the real world).

The statement is part of a public discourse on the capabilities and limitations of AI, specifically addressing the predictions made about AI's performance in certain domains. The tone is dismissive and somewhat confrontational, as it accuses another participant of 'coping' with the reality of AI's limitations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to a personal attack by accusing the other participant of 'coping.' [-2]