Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 9:33:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Xeno
@shorttimelines
·
201d
@GaryMarcus You have got to be kidding
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
201d
Serious question: in what way is o3 a “step towards AGI”?
Brennan Erbz
@BrennanErbz
·
201d
@GaryMarcus The larger issue that we all have is that you keep promoting the idea that progress has stalled or will stall, and that seems to be incorrect.

Is this AGI? No. Is this a step towards AGI? Yes.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the progress of AI technologies. The conversation involves a critique of the perception of progress in AI, specifically regarding the o3 announcement. The tone of the statement is direct and challenges the previous commenter's dismissal of the question posed by Gary Marcus.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a direct challenge to a previous comment but does not provide constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous comment without offering further explanation or engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-1]