Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 10:23:51 PM
X
In reply to:
AI Architect 🤖🔧
@ShivyanRiaz
·
198d
@GaryMarcus @GaryMarcus please set aside your biases or stop misleading your audience (who are clearly in denial). Take a look at what the creator of the ARC-AGI benchmark has to say about OpenAI O3 👇
Greg Kamradt
@GregKamradt
·
198d
We verified the o3 results for OpenAI on @arcprize

My first thought when I saw the prompt they used to claim their score was...

"That's it?"

It was refreshing (impressive) to see the prompt be so simple

"Find the common rule that maps an input grid to an output grid"
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
198d
Serious question: in what way is o3 a “step towards AGI”?
Brennan Erbz
@BrennanErbz
·
198d
@GaryMarcus The larger issue that we all have is that you keep promoting the idea that progress has stalled or will stall, and that seems to be incorrect.

Is this AGI? No. Is this a step towards AGI? Yes.

The conversation involves a discussion on the progress towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the evaluation of OpenAI's o3 results. It includes differing opinions on the significance and reliability of these results, referencing the ARC-AGI benchmark and comments from various individuals.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The conversation does not appear to cause harm, as it is a technical discussion about AGI progress. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding by engaging with different viewpoints and referencing expert opinions. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    There is an attempt at constructive criticism, though some comments suggest bias or misleading information, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]