Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 10:46:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Can we please just tell the truth
@FloodingLong
·
197d
@GaryMarcus @foundjuliette @agi_awaiter @fchollet In what way was GPT-4 that much of a jump from 3?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
197d
@foundjuliette @agi_awaiter @fchollet 03 is an improvement, but not an exponential or across the board improvement relative to its predecessors the way that gpt-4 was compared to 3 or or 3 was compared to 2. in some cases it is *worse* or only moderately better, e.g.:
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
197d
@GaryMarcus @agi_awaiter @fchollet good clarification. Many would say that the bar for breakthrough / significant advance is lower than for AGI though; hence putting your 2024 prediction against breakthrough on thin ice.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
197d
@foundjuliette @agi_awaiter @fchollet thanks, and further down (and something I would agree with) “it is important to note that ARC-AGI is not an acid test for AGI – as we've repeated dozens of times this year. It's a research tool designed to focus attention on the most challenging unsolved problems in AI, a role it…
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
197d
@GaryMarcus @agi_awaiter @fchollet here: https://arcprize.org/blog/oai-o3…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
197d
@foundjuliette @agi_awaiter @fchollet I disagree, but where did he say that? it’s not in his feed.

The statement is part of a technical discussion about the advancements and limitations of AI models, specifically GPT-4 compared to its predecessors. It addresses the nuances of AI development and performance metrics, which are relevant to public discourse on technology and innovation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive technical discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a detailed analysis of AI model performance. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on technical aspects. [+1]