Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 55
12/21/2024, 12:02:32 AM
X
In reply to:
AI Architect 🤖🔧
@ShivyanRiaz
·
192d
@GaryMarcus @fchollet
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
192d
Amazing how many people read part of @fchollet’s statement, quoted it to me, and didn’t get to Chollet’s critical qualifications (below) that were just a couple paragraphs later.

Incredible example of confirmation bias.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
192d
@foundjuliette @agi_awaiter @fchollet thanks, and further down (and something I would agree with) “it is important to note that ARC-AGI is not an acid test for AGI – as we've repeated dozens of times this year. It's a research tool designed to focus attention on the most challenging unsolved problems in AI, a role it…

The statement and image engage in a lighthearted and somewhat sarcastic tone, referencing predictions about AI developments in 2024. The conversation involves a mix of humor and critique, particularly regarding AI advancements and public perceptions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it is more of a humorous take on AI predictions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of critique but does not involve personal attacks. [+1]