Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47

Score 89

@uncertainsys not at all. coping is in the other direction, people pretending that o3 is as big an advance vs gpt 4 was vs gpt 3. it’s not.

it’s hugely expensive, only works in some domains, and hasn’t been subjected to external scientific scrutiny.

12/21/2024, 12:09:15 AM

In reply to:

Uncertain Systems (e/acc)

@uncertainsys

Gary coping hard xD

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

Important words from @fchollet:

“it is important to note that ARC-AGI is not an acid test for AGI – as we've repeated dozens of times this year. It's a research tool designed to focus attention on the most challenging unsolved problems in AI, a role it has fulfilled well over…

The statement critiques the perception of a technological advancement, specifically addressing the overestimation of a new AI model's capabilities compared to its predecessor. It highlights concerns about cost, domain limitations, and lack of external scientific validation, engaging in a substantive discussion about AI development and public perception.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing the technology rather than individuals, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying misconceptions about the AI model's capabilities, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the technology and does not resort to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]