Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 89
12/21/2024, 12:14:13 AM
X
In reply to:
Uncertain Systems (e/acc)
@uncertainsys
·
4d
@GaryMarcus Sure ofc one can cope in either direction, agree!

But tbh for how long are going to keep moving the goal post of calling something AGI. I mean regardless of the maturity of o3 it's pretty clear that something significant has been achieved
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
4d
@uncertainsys not at all. coping is in the other direction, people pretending that o3 is as big an advance vs gpt 4 was vs gpt 3. it’s not.

it’s hugely expensive, only works in some domains, and hasn’t been subjected to external scientific scrutiny.
Uncertain Systems (e/acc)
@uncertainsys
·
4d
Gary coping hard xD
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
4d
Important words from @fchollet:

“it is important to note that ARC-AGI is not an acid test for AGI – as we've repeated dozens of times this year. It's a research tool designed to focus attention on the most challenging unsolved problems in AI, a role it has fulfilled well over…

The statement by @GaryMarcus addresses a public issue related to the development and evaluation of artificial general intelligence (AGI). It engages in a debate about the maturity and significance of AI advancements, which is a substantive public discourse topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it seeks clarification and requests the other party to review previous explanations. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by asking the other party to read previous explanations, which could foster a more informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the accusation of 'goalpost shifting' and requests specific examples, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]