Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47

Score 107

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

@LakeBrenden That was not wise. It’s at most necessary and certainly not sufficient.

12/21/2024, 2:13:59 AM

In reply to:

Brenden Lake @ NeurIPS2024

@LakeBrenden

The benchmark sponsors did put AGI in the name. Not initially, but after years of little progress. I don’t like the term AGI but these comments are a little difficult to square.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

Important words from @fchollet:

“it is important to note that ARC-AGI is not an acid test for AGI – as we've repeated dozens of times this year. It's a research tool designed to focus attention on the most challenging unsolved problems in AI, a role it has fulfilled well over…

The statement is a critique of a previous comment in a discussion about the ARC-AGI benchmark and its role in AI research. The tone is critical but not aggressive, suggesting a disagreement with the previous statement's assessment of the benchmark's necessity and sufficiency.

Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived flaw in the previous comment. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the content of the discussion. [+1]