Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement critiques the U.S. government's fiscal policy, highlighting the budget deficit and calling for a balanced budget. It engages in public discourse by addressing a significant economic issue.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language ('dangerous thinking') which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it labels the opposing view as 'dangerous' without providing constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes without engaging in constructive dialogue or offering solutions, focusing instead on labeling the opposing view negatively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.