The statement 'and should have stayed out of it' is a dismissive comment in a conversation about the use of the term 'AGI' in AI research. It does not engage substantively with the public issue being discussed, which is the appropriateness and implications of using 'AGI' in research contexts. Instead, it focuses on a personal opinion about participation in the discussion.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could contribute to a negative discourse environment.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it lacks respect for the dignity of others by dismissing their participation.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is dismissive and could be seen as a personal attack.
[-2]