Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/21/2024, 3:06:48 PM
X
In reply to:
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
202d
@GaryMarcus well it’s like yanns shtick about not being as intelligent as a cat. I'm speaking about intelligence from the pov of the average person on the street. people in academic love to complicate it. we all know what intelligence is and what scaling it up would look like
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
202d
@iruletheworldmo feel free to make your own criteria and list.

Steve Wozniak made up the coffee test as a way of getting at understanding the real world. if you replace it, find something else that addresses it.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
202d
@GaryMarcus yeah but o3 isn't trained to be good at anything.

or rather. it's initially given lots of data and then trained to be good at broad reasoning. which it applies generally.

I also hate any definition of agi that needs to be embodied. this whole, can it walk into a random…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
202d
@iruletheworldmo [1. how should i know what’s in your anonymous head?]
2. i think an AGI should be able to control a robot as well as a human can teleoperate a robot. Is that not reasonable? Humans could teleop all those things.
3. A domain-specific medical system doesn’t necessarily entail AGI.…
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
202d
@GaryMarcus I assume you know why I don't like the list.

robotics will take longer and creative writing ect will be harder because we don't have right answers/tbinking to train on.

but if we get systems that cure disease ect, simply by scaling current paradigms.

the list just becomes…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
202d
@iruletheworldmo such a dumb comment; literally an ad hominem with zero argument. among your least impressive.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its capabilities compared to human intelligence. It engages with public issues related to technology and AI, contributing to the civic dialogue on these topics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a technical discussion about AGI capabilities.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a technical understanding of AGI.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a technical discussion without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the topic. [+1]