Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/21/2024, 3:17:29 PM
X
In reply to:
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
204d
@GaryMarcus well I think o10 will be able to do anything alpha fold can do. although i beleieve you exclude tool use as intelligence. which seems totally incompatible with everything else you say on intelligence.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
204d
@iruletheworldmo you are totally ignoring my AGI vs domain-specific AI point.

i didn’t say call AlphaFold dumb.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
204d
@GaryMarcus by these defifnions we'll have systems that cure all known disease, prevent death, show us time travel and all knowable secrets of the universe.

but let's call them dumb because they can't ride a mountain bike or pour a coffee. it's nonsense. it bends the meaning of…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
204d
@iruletheworldmo the average person is not an expert on intelligence
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
204d
@GaryMarcus but the average person doesn't think more intelligence strongly correlates with ability to ride mountain bikes or meow.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
204d
@iruletheworldmo the average person can walk into an average home and navigate it. with 30 min training they could teleop a robot to do that.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the nature of intelligence in AI systems, specifically addressing the role of tool use in defining intelligence. This is a substantive engagement with public issues related to AI and its capabilities, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a technical discussion, adhering to the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about the definition of intelligence in AI, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to the principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss AI intelligence, aligning with the principle. [+1]