Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 118
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
211d
Wow. This, if true, raises serious questions about yesterday’s announcement.
12/21/2024, 6:25:45 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
211d
@GaryMarcus What is your argument that LLMs can't reason when they get scores like this?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
211d
How many times do we have to see this same movie, where an AI beats some benchmark and influencers gleefully shout “It’s So Over” without even trying out the AI and then on careful inspection the AI turns out to not be robust or reliable?

Thousands?

(It’s already been…

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the reliability and robustness of AI models, specifically addressing concerns about training practices and performance metrics. It questions the validity of AI achievements and calls for a deeper examination of the data and methods used.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about AI reliability, promoting caution and critical evaluation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on the technical aspects of AI rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning AI performance metrics and encouraging further investigation. [+1]