Gary Marcus

The conversation revolves around the transparency of AI training processes, specifically regarding OpenAI's use of training data. The discussion highlights concerns about the lack of transparency and the implications for understanding AI performance. The tone is critical and seeks accountability.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement seeks to address potential harm by advocating for transparency, which is crucial for ethical AI development. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional transparency rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The dialogue engages in constructive criticism, questioning the practices of AI training and seeking clarity. [+1]