In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
371d
The statement expresses skepticism about the transparency of data augmentation and verification processes in AI models, indicating a preference for non-LLM approaches until more information is available. This reflects a concern for accountability and transparency in AI development.
- The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency, which can prevent misinformation and misuse of AI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the need for transparency rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the transparency of AI processes, promoting dialogue on the issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.