In reply to:
Merovingian
@f4talStrategies
·
372d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
372d
The statement is part of a broader discussion about the transparency and ethical considerations in AI benchmarking practices, specifically related to the ARC Challenge Set. It critiques the communication and potential misleading nature of a video related to AI performance claims.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of misleading practices, which could be seen as a form of harm if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but criticizes the transparency of information shared.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying misconceptions about AI benchmarking practices. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing potential misinformation but could be seen as indirectly attacking the credibility of those involved. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss important issues in AI transparency, aligning with responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.