Stephen Semler
@stephensemler
·
195d
The statement and accompanying content engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of military spending and the influence of military contractors on Senate votes. The tone is one of shock and criticism, suggesting concern over the financial influence on political decisions.
- The statement aims to highlight potential ethical concerns in political funding, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by raising awareness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By expressing shock, the statement seeks to promote understanding of the issue, though it could be more informative. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes the Senate's actions but does not engage in personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to question political practices, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.