In reply to:
David Balfour
@hal_incandenza4
·
374d
The statement is part of a conversation about the training practices of AI models, specifically regarding the use of ARC public examples. It addresses a public concern about transparency and ethical practices in AI development, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a factual rebuttal.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a factual discussion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a perceived misunderstanding without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to clarify a point in the discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.