In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
374d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about the credibility and accountability of public predictions, which is a public concern in the context of public figures and their influence.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be perceived as dismissive, which might indirectly harm the discourse by discouraging open dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement challenges the accuser to provide evidence, which is a form of constructive criticism, but the tone is somewhat confrontational, bordering on a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges past mistakes regarding winograd schemas and OpenAI valuations, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.