In reply to:
Chubby♨️
@kimmonismus
·
374d
The statement and images involve a discussion about the transparency and ethics of AI training practices, referencing a hypothetical scenario involving a public figure. The conversation critiques the potential lack of disclosure by OpenAI regarding their training methods, which is a substantive public issue related to AI ethics and transparency.
- The statement raises concerns about ethical practices in AI, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation respects privacy and dignity, focusing on organizational practices rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The dialogue engages in constructive criticism, addressing potential issues in AI practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.