Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 1:02:35 AM
X
In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
375d
@GaryMarcus
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
424d
If Harris wins, a lot of people will have to ask themselves, “what exactly am I getting out of X, other than propaganda?”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
375d
@KettlebellDan Which? I keep asking people for documentation and they never give any.

I was wrong about winograd schemas and OpenAI valuations and not a lot else that I know of.
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
375d
@GaryMarcus I’ve never accused you of moving goalposts, but you seem to employ the technique of making a lot of predictions and then claiming the ones that come true and letting the rest fall to obscurity
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
375d
approximately 100 people on this site have accused me of moving goalposts.

exactly zero have ever documented this claim.

if you believe it, bring receipts.

if you don’t have receipts, please go away.

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a debate about the credibility and argumentative techniques of a public figure, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is somewhat dismissive and implies a lack of understanding on the part of the other participant.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It implies a personal attack by suggesting the other person is 'rusty' on logic, which can be seen as an ad hominem argument. [-1]