Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a discussion about the interpretation of a model's performance and the implications of training data exposure. It critiques the communication and perception of the model's capabilities, focusing on public understanding and transparency.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather seeks to clarify misunderstandings. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by addressing misconceptions about the model's performance. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by discussing the implications of the remarks and the public's interpretation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.