In reply to:
François Chollet
@fchollet
·
375d
Niels Rogge
@NielsRogge
·
376d
The statement engages in a discussion about the interpretation of a presentation related to AI model training and performance. It addresses the discrepancy between the intended message and the audience's takeaway, highlighting a potential misunderstanding or miscommunication. The tone is analytical and seeks to clarify the situation.
- The statement does not cause harm and aims to clarify a misunderstanding, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By attempting to clarify the situation, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.