The statement by Gary Marcus addresses a public issue related to transparency and honesty in AI training practices, specifically concerning OpenAI's use of training sets. The tone is defensive, aiming to clarify misunderstandings and assert credibility. The intent is to engage in a broader discussion about AI ethics and practices.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is defensive in nature, which might not fully align with the principle of striving to do no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does respond to a personal attack, maintaining a level of respect. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying the speaker's position and experience, though it could be more empathetic.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by addressing misunderstandings but could be seen as defensive rather than constructive, missing an opportunity for deeper engagement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.