Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 2:59:36 AM
X
In reply to:
Numerus Opinions
@NumerusOpinions
·
376d
@GaryMarcus But you want regulations today?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
377d
“Gary isn't saying we'll never get AGI. He's saying it won't be soon, scaling won't work after a limit, and current architecture isn't enough.”

Exactly! 90% of the attacks on me distort this, creating a strawman.
vivid
@vividhkothari
·
377d
@TheMysteryDrop @GaryMarcus Not necessarily. Gary isn't saying we'll never get AGI. He's saying it won't be soon, scaling won't work after a limit, and current architecture isn't enough.

His current views are not based on new research, new breakthroughs, new paradigms, that we get to use and test.

The statement by @NumerusOpinions engages in public discourse as it addresses the societal issue of AI regulation and the challenges posed by current AI technologies. The tone is critical and aims to highlight the problems caused by AI systems that lack proper factuality checks, referencing a broader discussion on AI's limitations and the need for regulation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights potential harm caused by AI, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of AI's limitations, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to discuss AI regulation, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss AI issues, aligning with the principle. [+1]