The statement addresses the machine learning community, urging them to choose between science, transparency, and openness versus hype. It implies a critique of current practices within the community, suggesting a need for a decision on ethical and professional standards.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique that could be seen as divisive. It challenges the community to reflect on their values.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and transparency by encouraging the community to align with scientific integrity rather than hype. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather presents a dichotomy for the community to consider, which could be seen as constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of the scientific community by promoting transparency and openness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to address an important issue within the community. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.