In reply to:
Pegasus kouga
@BronzePostagem
·
377d
The statement engages in a discussion about transparency and breakthroughs in the context of artificial general intelligence (AGI), which is a public issue related to technology and ethics. The tone is skeptical and seeks clarity on the claims made about AGI.
- The statement does not cause harm and seeks clarity, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the lack of transparency, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the claims without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the transparency of claims made in the public domain. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.