Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 3:25:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Mathieu Tuli
@TuliMathieu
·
383d
@GaryMarcus @fchollet
François Chollet
@fchollet
·
383d
@NielsRogge This is the point of the training set, though -- to train your model on it. It would be even more impressive if the model had no prior exposure to ARC data, but the fact that the model was ARC-adapted via the training set absolutely does not invalidate its score.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
383d
Update: It IS true, from @fchollet’s blog. 𝗢𝟯 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝟳𝟱% 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗥𝗖-𝗔𝗚𝗜.

Yesterday’s announcement shows what you can do when teach to the test and spend enormous amounts of money.

How much the demo says about real…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
384d
Wow. This, if true, raises serious questions about yesterday’s announcement.

The statement is part of a public discourse about the training practices of AI models, specifically addressing concerns about the validity of performance claims. The tone is informative and seeks to clarify previous points made in the discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify and inform, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By addressing previous points, the statement promotes understanding and transparency. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing past discussions without personal attacks. [+1]