Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 3:42:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Merovingian
@f4talStrategies
·
386d
@GaryMarcus Lol, Gary, I’ve made multiple direct critiques of your claims, and you’ve dodged all of them. Maybe engage with the 98% of critiques you’re conveniently ignoring before complaining about ad hominem.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
386d
Same same: “a lot of criticism of Gary but little critique of his specific claims.”

I love the 2% that actually engages with real claims.

The fact the rest is ad hominem speaks volumes.
The Retro Burn
@burntheretro
·
386d
@TheAlphaDoggo @FaustinoBerlin @GaryMarcus The best thing about logic is that it is easily distinguishable regardless of the context.

I see a lot of criticism of Gary but little critique of his specific claims.

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the nature of critiques and engagement in public discourse, specifically addressing the quality of critiques directed at Gary Marcus. The tone is defensive and somewhat dismissive, suggesting that the speaker feels unfairly targeted or misunderstood. The intent seems to be to clarify their position and to challenge the notion that they are ignoring valid critiques.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement attempts to engage in constructive dialogue by addressing the nature of critiques and clarifying the speaker's stance. However, it also contains a defensive tone that could be perceived as dismissive, which might hinder constructive engagement.