In reply to:
Jim, “The” Average Guy
@avgchiefsfan
·
195d
The statement is part of a conversation about a government funding bill and its implications, specifically regarding the inclusion of funds for pediatric cancer research. It engages with public policy and legislative processes, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language and is focused on legislative processes. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement implicitly supports understanding and compassion by advocating for the inclusion of pediatric cancer research funding. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the legislative process. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for the inclusion of pediatric cancer research funding, the statement uses influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly engages in public discourse about legislative matters. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.