Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 2:39:33 PM
X
In reply to:
David Finsterwalder
@DFinsterwalder
路
387d
@DeathStarRobot @GaryMarcus He seems to be currently doubling down in his statements on the training set (and makes a mega thread). I don鈥檛 want get drawn into a side on this. I tagged him to make sure he sees this and that I take that statement back.
Death Star Robot 馃嚭馃嚫 馃嚭馃嚘 馃嚠馃嚤 馃嚬馃嚰
@DeathStarRobot
路
387d
@DFinsterwalder @GaryMarcus You are name dropping Gary Marcus for liking one of your posts, but then pretending shame or regret? lol, that makes me laugh. This is how you got sub-famous!
David Finsterwalder
@DFinsterwalder
路
387d
Oh no. I misunderstood the generalization in the ARC AGI challenge and now @GaryMarcus liked my reply.

For the record: I started to look into the debate and started reading the paper and from what I see here: Gary is most likely wrong. The test set seems very different.

The statement is part of a public discourse on a technical debate regarding AI generalization and test sets. The tone is defensive and slightly confrontational, aiming to correct a perceived misunderstanding.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but is slightly confrontational.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be more respectful in tone.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement attempts to engage in dialogue but does so in a defensive manner.聽[-1]