In reply to:
The statement 'see also below re one recent example of lack of transparency and its costs' is part of a broader conversation about transparency in the machine learning community. It references a discussion initiated by Gary Marcus about the importance of science, transparency, and openness versus hype in the field. This statement contributes to public discourse by addressing the issue of transparency, which is a significant concern in the development and deployment of AI technologies.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a concern about transparency, which can indirectly prevent harm by advocating for openness.ย [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By pointing out a lack of transparency, the statement encourages understanding and accountability, promoting a culture of openness.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on a systemic issue, which aligns with constructive criticism.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By addressing transparency, the statement uses influence to advocate for better practices in the AI community, contributing to societal betterment.ย [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a critical discussion about transparency, using the platform responsibly.ย [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.