Gary Marcus

The statement involves a discussion about the training practices of a machine learning model, specifically regarding the use of a public training set. It raises concerns about the validity of performance claims if the model was trained on a significant portion of the test set, which could lead to misleading results. The conversation critiques the transparency and implications of such practices.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential harm in terms of misleading performance claims, which could impact trust in AI systems. It adheres to the principle by questioning practices that might lead to harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on technical and ethical issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the methodology and implications of the training practices, promoting a dialogue on ethical AI development. [+1]