In reply to:
μ
@michalwols
·
390d
The statement by @michalwols addresses allegations made in a public conversation about Uber's acquisition of a startup. The tone is defensive and accusatory, focusing on refuting claims of defamation and clarifying the relationship with Uber's ATG group. The intent is to protect the reputation of the speaker and their group by demanding the removal of allegedly defamatory content.
- The statement aims to protect the speaker's reputation, but the accusatory tone could be seen as potentially harmful, especially if the defamation claim is not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses another user of defamation, which could be seen as a form of harassment if not justified. However, it does not engage in hate speech. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism. Instead, it focuses on demanding the removal of content and labeling it as defamatory, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.