Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 4:18:42 PM
X
In reply to:
Filip Dimitrovski
@fikisipi
·
391d
@GaryMarcus You should be slammed by @CommunityNotes.
The public set is meant to be used for training. That's why it's public.
On top of that, @arcprize is collaborating with OpenAI and checking the results.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
391d
Never trust a staged demo.
Never trust a product you haven’t tried.
Never trust OpenAI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
391d
Update: It IS true, from @fchollet’s blog. 𝗢𝟯 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝟳𝟱% 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗥𝗖-𝗔𝗚𝗜.

Yesterday’s announcement shows what you can do when teach to the test and spend enormous amounts of money.

How much the demo says about real…

The statement and linked discussion engage in public discourse by addressing concerns about the transparency and validity of OpenAI's training methods and the implications of their announcements. The conversation critiques the use of public data for training and questions the authenticity of OpenAI's demonstrations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about transparency and potential misinformation, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by questioning practices that may mislead the public. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The discussion respects privacy and dignity, focusing on corporate practices rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism, questioning OpenAI's methods and encouraging dialogue about the implications of their practices. [+1]