Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the importance of evidence-based assessments in AI development, highlighting the risks of hype without scrutiny. It emphasizes the need for clear evaluations to prevent misleading the public and the AI field.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for clear and evidence-based assessments, which can prevent misinformation and potential harm from hype.ย [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and caution in AI progress, encouraging a more informed and empathetic approach to technological advancements.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting the need for scrutiny and evidence-based assessments without resorting to personal attacks.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for responsible AI progress, the statement uses its influence for societal betterment.ย [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing the need for scrutiny in AI developments.ย [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.