The statement engages in a technical discussion about machine learning models, specifically addressing the fairness of comparing machine results to human results when the training data is not equally accessible to both. The tone is analytical and seeks to clarify a point about model evaluation.
- The statement strives to clarify a misunderstanding, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By explaining a technical point, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for those who may not grasp the nuances of machine learning. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific issue without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.